Welcome to the Instructional Design: The Looking Glass of Learning blog


Welcome to the Instructional Design: The Looking Glass of Learning blog. Although we will not be discussing the theories behind Lewis Carroll's meaning of Alice's adventures beyond the rabbit hole, we will however be able to take this opportunity to share educational feedback, theories and philosophies pertaining to Instructional Design, learning practices and ideologies openly.



The purpose of this blog is to keep our creative thoughts following and partake in thought provoking discussions that allow each us to learn even more about ourselves, one another and the worlds in which we teach and learn.



Making eLearning Design Look Easier

Thursday, March 17, 2011

It's All In the Approach: The Art of Effective Communication

The Art of Effective Communication (Laureate, n.d.) offers three modalities regarding peer-to-peer communication concerning the need for data in order to meet a required deadline. The modalities were delivered in written (email) and spoken (voicemail and face-to-face) form. The following provides a summary of how each modality was interpreted or what was perceived based upon the content, tone, and delivery of the message.

Ironically, the need for the data referenced in the message was consistent across each modality. Yet the there was a variance in tone and expression. Although delivered in written form the email prompted more urgency to the reader while the voicemail gave a sense of concern. Since emotions were translated through visual stimulation during the face-to-face conversation, the message was perceived as more engaging and straightforward versus accusatory as it could have been portrayed to others via email.

Each modality delivered the message clearly however, the voicemail seemed to be conveyed best based upon the utilized words, phrases, and tone. For instance, the use of first and second person seemed to lack in emphasis than did other key words such as “ETA”, “report”, and “data”. One of the main factors that influenced this selection, or choice, was the tone of the message. Although sounding concerned, the caller was able to portray a sense of urgency in the need for the data without seeming overly accusatory. Most importantly, the closing was perceived as sincere unlike the face-to-face interaction which was perceived as less sincere.

As proven through this exercise, different interpretations or perceptions can be drawn through different modalities. The critical lesson learned from this exercise in relation to project work and/or project management is how important and effective or ineffective the mode and method of communication can be in situations. Portny, et al. (2007) find one aspect of success is the ability to communicate effectively, and argue that “Through communication people exchange and share information with one another, and influence one another’s attitudes, behaviors, and understandings” (p. 357). Taking this into consideration it is important to hone in on effective communication skills whether through written or verbal form by recognizing how to build a rapport with our clients and team members, when to introduce the use of first, second, or third person, to be aggressive in the approach, or decide the best mode of delivery to the intended audience. Starting off with these few items provide steps closer to potential success.


Resources

Laureate Media (n.d.). Art of effective communication. Retrieved from http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/EDUC/6145/03/mm/aoc/index.html

Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

4 comments:

Unknown said...

Hi Renee, I also felt that the face-to-face was less sincere. I felt like it was sort of rehearsed. I felt that her hand movements made her look nervous.

I felt the email was the one that came across as being on the verge of being rude. I am always careful when writing an email, it so amazing how one or two words can change the tone in an email.

Andrea

Anonymous said...

Hello Renee,
As you point out in your analysis, effective communication skills are vital to maintain excellent working relationships with members and clients. A potential benefit, for example, would be that the person will understand the urgency of the message and comply with the request, thus building strong relationship between the parties. Portny et. al. (2008) state that the key to successful project management is effective communication.

Reference:
Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Hollis Easter said...

Hi Renee,

I'm curious to hear why you think using first- and second-person sentences weakens the speaker's message. Are you contrasting them with third-person sentences, or making some other comparison that I'm missing?

A number of communications and management texts I've read over the years (too long ago to cite, alas) talk about the importance of using "I statements" to help keep communications from becoming confrontations. Do you disagree with that, or are you making some other argument here?

I think these messages attempt to build rapport at the beginning of the message, but they don't do it very effectively. I agree that the email suffers the most.

Nice post!

Unknown said...

Hi Renee,
You make some valid points.

I agree that the verbal and non verbal cues you get on the phone, or in person can add an additional layer to the message and often means more to the message's meaning than the words themselves.

All of this analysis makes me think about how my messages are interpreted. How will the reciever percieve my written message? How will the person on the other end of the phone percieve my voice and tone? How will the person I'm facing interpret my body language and facial expressions?

Furthermore, I think the perceptions people have about communicating is developed by the communication modality they prefer to use. For example, some people might go to someone's desk to ask them a question because they prefer a interpersonal interaction. At the same time, someone might focus on time management and ask the question in an email.

What kind of person are you? What modality do you prefer?

Thanks for sharing,
Meredith